Policinski notes:
Longstanding military policies bar criticism of the commander in chief, and forbid uniformed military members from taking part in a variety of public political activities. Some say Stein’s claim to First Amendment protection challenges the military’s ability to operate a system based on obedience to superior officers and on order and discipline.Referring to an issue of accountability for the Marine's behavior, Policinski writes:
[F]rom a First Amendment viewpoint, Stein’s organizing an “Armed Forces Tea Party” would seem to be conduct that more clearly runs afoul of regulations than mere personal commentary with a partisan tinge.Policinski, who's senior vice president and executive director of the First Amendment Center, concludes that a clear standard needs to be established for all citizens that differentiates between their conduct and their speech. Good idea!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please comment on my blog post--or ask me a question about writing!.